The Rock Creek International School

1:07-bk-00272DcbSep 2, 2008

Full text

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
In re
THE ROCK CREEK INTERNATIONAL
SCHOOL,
Debtor.
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 07-00272
(Chapter 11)
Not for Publication in
West’s Bankruptcy Reporter
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DIRECTING DEBTOR
TO SUPPLEMENT OBJECTION TO CLAIM OF CERIDIAN CORP.
The debtor, Rock Creek International School, has filed an
objection to the claim of Ceridian Corporation (“Claimant”). On
August 9, 2007, Claimant filed proof of claim number 17,
asserting an unsecured non-priority claim in the amount of
$246.99 (the “Claim”). 	The claimant’s proof of claim
constitutes prima facie evidence of the validity and amount of
the claim. 	Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(f). 	The debtor contends that
“Claimant is no longer owed $246.99, because it has since paid
such claim in full and is owed a credit balance, as evidenced by
the invoice reflecting the credit balance provided by the
Claimant, attached [to the objection] as Exhibit ‘A.’” The
attachment, however, relates to a different invoice number than
the invoice number of the invoice attached to the proof of claim,
The Memorandum Decision and Order below is hereby
signed. Dated: September 2, 2008.
_____________________________
S. Martin Teel, Jr.
United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 07-00272 Doc 216 Filed 09/02/08 Entered 09/02/08 12:52:48 Desc Main
Document Page 1 of 2
2	O:\TEEL\Judge Temp Docs\Rock Creek International School - Order to Supplement Objection to Ceridian Claim.wpd
and the Claimant has supplemented its proof of claim by filing an
explanation that it took a security deposit for $300 from the
debtor postpetition for continuing to provide the debtor
postpetition services, resulting in a credit balance with respect
to the debtor’s postpetition account in the amount of $300.
Although that supplementation was not filed by a member of the
bar of the court, and was not filed as an amended proof of claim
under penalty of perjury (which would not have required filing by
a member of the bar of the court), neither was the attachment to
the debtor’s objection accompanied by a statement under penalty
of perjury. 	It is accordingly
ORDERED that by September 25, 2008, the debtor shall file a
supplementation to its objection to the proof of claim of
Ceridian Corp. rebutting the prima facie validity of that proof
of claim, if such rebuttal evidence is available.
[Signed and dated above.]
Copies to: Debtor; Debtor’s attorney; Office of United States
Trustee; Patrick J. Potter, and:
Linda L. Cory
Account Relations Rep.
Ceridian Corporation
9150 South Hill Blvd., #100
Broadview Heights, OH 44147
Bill Arnold
Marcher Consultants, Inc
8230 Leesburg Pike, Suite 610
Vienna, VA 22182
Case 07-00272 Doc 216 Filed 09/02/08 Entered 09/02/08 12:52:48 Desc Main
Document Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.