USA v. King et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Criminal Case No. 1:24-cr-00251-RMR-5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
5. 	ROBERT O’SULLIVAN,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRAVEL
Susan Prose, United States Magistrate Judge
This case is before the court on Defendant Robert O’Sullivan’s Unopposed Motion to
Travel for Business, ECF No. 185 (the “Motion”) after it was referred by District Judge Regina
M. Rodriguez, ECF No. 186. Defendant is currently out on bond awaiting sentencing and subject
to conditions of release set by this court. ECF No. 48. Relevant here, those conditions limit
Defendant’s travel outside the Central District of California. Id. at 2.
Defendant seeks permission to travel from his residence in Los Angeles, California, to
Fort Lauderdale and Tampa, Florida, from November 20 through November 22, 2025, to attend
pre-arranged, in-person business meetings on behalf of his employer. Mot. at 1-2. The
Government does not oppose the requested travel, provided Defendant remains in full
compliance with all bond conditions and satisfies the specific reporting and check-in
requirements outlined in the Motion. Id. at 2–3. Defendant’s supervising Pretrial Services Officer
in the Central District of California and the U.S. Probation Officer in Colorado have been
Case No. 1:24-cr-00251-RMR Document 189 filed 11/18/25 USDC Colorado pg 1
of 2

2
consulted and have raised no objection. Id. at 3.
Finding good cause, the court GRANTS the Motion. Defendant may travel from Los
Angeles, California to Fort Lauderdale and Tampa, Florida to attend business meetings at the
request of his employer on November 20, 2025, returning to Los Angeles on November 22,
2025, provided the following conditions are met:
1. 	Defendant must be compliant with all bond conditions and Probation/Pretrial
Services Office instructions at the time of the trip. He must confer with his
supervising pretrial services officer in California the day before his departure,
and the supervising probation officer must confirm compliance with his bond
conditions and authorize his travel at that time, if he is compliant; and
2. 	Defendant must provide all travel details to his supervising probation officer
and supervising pretrial services officer prior to leaving Los Angeles, including
flight reservations, hotel information, and telephone contact information where
he may be reached for the duration of his trip; and
3. 	Defendant must check in with his supervising pretrial services officer as
required by the officer during his travel
In all other respects, Defendant remains subject to the previously-imposed conditions of release.
See ECF No. 48.
DATED: November 18, 2025 	BY THE COURT:
Susan Prose
United States Magistrate Judge
Case No. 1:24-cr-00251-RMR Document 189 filed 11/18/25 USDC Colorado pg 2
of 2