USA v. Zarate-Suarez et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case No. 18-MJ-01088-KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTINA FITZGERALD,
Defendant.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and REASONS
FOR ORDER OF DETENTION
This matter is before the court for detention hearing on May 17, 2018. The court
has taken judicial notice of the court’s file and the pretrial services report. Moreover, the
court has considered the proffers by the defendant and the government.
In order to sustain a motion for detention, the government must establish that (a)
there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be imposed in connection
with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the defendant’s presence for court
proceedings; or (b) there is no condition or combination of conditions which could be
imposed in connection with pretrial release that would reasonably insure the safety of
any other person or the community. The former element must be established by a
preponderance of the evidence, while the latter requires proof by clear and convincing
evidence.
If there is probable cause to believe that the Defendant committed an offense
Case No. 1:18-cr-00266-PAB Document 26 filed 05/17/18 USDC Colorado pg 1
of 4

which carries a maximum term of imprisonment of over 10 years and is an offense
prescribed by the Controlled Substances Act, a rebuttable presumption arises that no
condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the
person as required and the safety of the community.
The Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g), directs the court to consider the
following factors in determining whether there are conditions of release that will
reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and the safety of any
other person and the community:
(1) 	[t]he nature and circumstances of the offense charged, including whether
the offense is a crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug;
(2) 	the weight of the evidence against the person;
(3) 	the history and characteristics of the person, including –
(A) 	the person’s character, physical and mental condition, family ties,
employment, financial resources, length of residence in the
community, community ties, past conduct, history relating to drug or
alcohol abuse, criminal history, and record concerning appearance
at court proceedings; and
(B) 	whether at the time of the current offense or arrest, the person was
on probation, on parole, or on other release pending trial,
sentencing, appeal, or completion of sentence for an offense under
Federal, State or local law; and
(4) 	the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community
that would be posed by the person’s release.
The government is requesting detention in this case. In making my findings of
fact, I have taken judicial notice of the information set forth in the pretrial services report
and the entire court file. I have also considered the proffers submitted by the
government and defense counsel and the arguments of counsel. Weighing the
Case No. 1:18-cr-00266-PAB Document 26 filed 05/17/18 USDC Colorado pg 2
of 4

statutory factors set forth in the Bail Reform Act, I find the following:
First, the defendant has been charged in the Criminal Complaint as follows:
Count 1: Distribution and Possession with Intent to Distribute a Controlled
Substance Methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(c).
Second, I find probable cause exists that defendant has committed the above
offense based upon the waiver of preliminary hearing by defendant.
Third, I find that defendant has a history of cocaine and methamphetamine use.
She has also sued marijuana and alcohol in the past. According to the PSIR, defendant
was using cocaine and methamphetamine daily for approximately three years.
Defendant has participated in the Residential Drug Abuse Treatment Program (RDAP)
while incarcerated in the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). She has also received outpatient
treatment at a half way house in Richmond, Virginia.
Fourth, I find that defendant is a lifetime reside of Virginia and not Colorado.
Defendant may have a torn Achilles tendon and currently taking anti-inflammatory non-
narcotic pain medication. Defendant has previously been diagnosed with Bipolar
Disorder; Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHA); for over ten (10) years. Defendant has also been diagnosed with
Depression. She has been prescribed Effexor, Adderall, Xanax, Yuvanse and
Resperdal to treat the above mental health conditions. Defendant has made multiple
attempts at suicide wherein she was hospitalized. Defendant also began counseling for
her mental health issues on July 5, 2010.
Fifth, I find that defendant does not possess a Colorado Driver’s License. It does
not appear that defendant has any familial or financial ties to Colorado. Defendant has
suffered convictions for DUS [two separate convictions]; Obtained Money by False
Pretenses (felony)[five separate convictions]; Forgery (felony)[two separate
convictions]; Possession with Intent to Distribute Drugs (felony); and Conspiracy to
Distribute 50 Grams or More of Methamphetamine or 500 Grams or More of a
Detectable Amount of Methamphetamine (felony). Defendant has suffered one prior
failure to appear and one prior failure to comply both resulting in warrants being issued.
Case No. 1:18-cr-00266-PAB Document 26 filed 05/17/18 USDC Colorado pg 3
of 4

Defendant’s Supervised Release has been revoked in the past. The basis for the
Petition to Revoke Supervised Release is outlined on page 7 of the Pretrial Services
Report dated 05-16-18. In summary, the defendant did not perform well on Supervised
Release as outlined in the Petition and such Petition was sustained. The defendant has
committed new crimes while on Supervised Release. That based upon the charges
brought in the Criminal Complaint the rebuttable presumption of detention applies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3) and (f) and the defendant has not rebutted that
presumption. 	The defendant is not contesting detention.
In light of these facts, I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant
is a flight risk and that no condition or combination of conditions of release will
reasonably assure her presence in court . Accordingly, I order that the defendant be
detained without bond.
Done this 17th day of May 2018.
BY THE COURT
S/ Michael J. Watanabe
Michael J. Watanabe
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Case No. 1:18-cr-00266-PAB Document 26 filed 05/17/18 USDC Colorado pg 4
of 4