1:17-cv-01195•Cocona, Inc. v. Columbia Sportswear Company
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No.16-cv-02703-CMA-SBP (consolidated for pretrial purposes with Civil Action No. 17-cv-01195-CMA-SBP, Cocona, Inc. v. Columbia Sportswear Company) COCONA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. VF OUTDOOR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendant. ORDER This patent infringement matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause. (Doc. # 181.) The Court has determined it does not have jurisdiction over the unasserted claims in this matter. (Doc. # 180.) See Ameranth, Inc. v. Dominos Pizza, LLC, 792 F. App'x 780, 784-85 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (finding no subject matter jurisdiction to determine the validity of claims that were not asserted in the pleadings and did not appear in the plaintiff’s infringement contentions). In the Response to Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff agrees that judgment may enter in favor of Defendants on the grounds that the asserted claims are invalid, as found by the Court in its Amended Order on Claim Construction (ECF No. 17). Case No. 1:17-cv-01195-CMA-SBP Document 65 filed 02/05/25 USDC Colorado pg 1 of 2
2 Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants VF Outdoor, LLC, and Columbia Sportswear Company, and against Plaintiff pursuant to the Amended Order on Claim Construction (ECF No. 176) only on the asserted claims in these matters. DATED: February 5, 2025 BY THE COURT: _____________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO Senior United States District Judge Case No. 1:17-cv-01195-CMA-SBP Document 65 filed 02/05/25 USDC Colorado pg 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.