1:24-cv-00082•Catfish Farmers of America et al v. United States
Full text
Slip Op. 26-103 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CATFISH FARMERS OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and CAN THO IMPORT EXPORT SEAFOOD JOINT STOCK COMPANY, Defendant-Intervenor. Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Judge Court No. 24-00082 JUDGMENT Before the court are the Final Results of Redetermination pursuant to Court Remand (Apr. 15, 2026), ECF Nos. 54 (public), 55 (conf.) (the “Remand Redetermination”). No party has commented in opposition to the Remand Redetermination as it pertains to this case, and defendant United States advocates, accordingly, that it be sustained by the court in that respect. Def.’s Req. to Sustain Remand Results (June 2, 2026), ECF No. 58. The court concludes that the Remand Redetermination, as it pertains to this case, complies with the court’s order in Catfish Farmers of Am. v. United States, 49 CIT __, 815 Case 1:24-cv-00082-TCS Document 63 Filed 09/04/26 Page 1 of 2
Court No. 24-00082 Page 2 Fed. Supp. 3d 1339 (2025), in particular in stating that “[w]e agree that the allegation identified an error that was ministerial in nature.” Remand Redetermination 20-21. Therefore, in consideration of the Remand Redetermination and all papers and proceedings had herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Redetermination be, and hereby is, sustained as it pertains to this action; and it is further ORDERED that entries affected by this action shall be liquidated in accordance with the final court decision in this litigation. _/s/ Timothy C. Stanceu_ Timothy C. Stanceu Judge Dated: September 4, 2026 New York, New York Case 1:24-cv-00082-TCS Document 63 Filed 09/04/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.