3:26-cv-00879•Cristobal-Marquez v. LaRose et al
Full text
1 3:26-cv-879-CAB-BJW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FAUSTINO CRISTOBAL-MARQUEZ, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER LAROSE, et al., Respondents. Case No.: 3:26-cv-879-CAB-BJW ORDER REQUIRING A BOND HEARING Pending before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Petitioner Faustino Cristobal-Marquez. [Doc. No. 1 (“Petition”).] Petitioner asserts, inter alia, that he is entitled to a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). [Id. at 9–11.] Respondents’ return to the Petition acknowledges that pursuant to the final judgment in Maldonado Bautista v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-1873-SSS-BFM, 2025 WL 3678485 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025), “Petitioner is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and is entitled to an order from this Court directing a bond hearing be held pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a).” [Doc. No. 4 at 2.] /// /// /// /// Case 3:26-cv-00879-CAB-BJW Document 6 Filed 02/23/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 3:26-cv-879-CAB-BJW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court thus ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner an individualized bond hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its associated regulations by March 9, 2026. Respondents are further ORDERED to update this Court on the status of Petitioner’s bond hearing by March 10, 2026. It is SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2026 Case 3:26-cv-00879-CAB-BJW Document 6 Filed 02/23/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.