3:26-cv-00667•Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
Full text
1 26cv0667 DMS JLB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIDOY MAKSUDER, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER LAROSE; PATRICK DIVVER; KRISTI NOEM; PAMELA BONDI, Respondents. Case No.: 26cv0667 DMS JLB ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE On February 2, 2026, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Respondents shall file their response to the Petition on or before by February 12, 2026. Petitioner shall file his reply on or before February 17, 2026. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the matter will be submitted on the papers without oral argument. To maintain the status quo, Respondents, their officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and other persons who act in concert or participation with Respondent MUST NOT transfer Petitioner outside the Southern District of California pending the Court’s resolution of the Petition. See Doe v. Bondi, Case No.: 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB, 2025 WL 1870979 at *1 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2025) (“Federal courts retain jurisdiction to preserve Case 3:26-cv-00667-DMS-JLB Document 2 Filed 02/05/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 1 of 2
2 26cv0667 DMS JLB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the status quo while determining whether [they have] subject matter jurisdiction over a case and while a petition is pending resolution from the court.”) (collecting cases). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 5, 2026 Case 3:26-cv-00667-DMS-JLB Document 2 Filed 02/05/26 PageID.<pageID> Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.