Uribe Trejo v. LaRose et al

1
3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BEATRIZ URIBE TREJO,
Petitioner,
v.
CHRISTOPHER LAROSE; SIDNEY
AKI; TODD LYONS; KRISTI NOEM;
PAMELA BONDI; U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF HOMELAND SECURITY; U.S.
IMMIGRAION AND CUSTOM
ENFORCEMENT,
Respondents.
Case No.: 3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL
ORDER PROVIDING NOTICE
UNDER RULE 65(a)(2)
[ECF NO. 5]
Before the Court is Petitioner Beatriz Uribe Trejo’s Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1 (“Petition”). The Court issued an Order
to Show Cause (“OSC”) requiring Respondents to file a response to the Petition by
November 28, 2025. ECF No. 2. After the Court issued the OSC, Petitioner filed a Motion
for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) on the same basis as the Petition. The Court
does not modify the briefing schedule previously issued in the OSC. However, the Court
provides notice to the Parties that it intends to consolidate the Motion for a Temporary
Restraining Order with a determination on the merits under Rule 65(a)(2). See Fed. R. Civ.
P. 65(a)(2); see also Slidewaters LLC v. Wash. State Dep't of Lab. & Indus., 4 F.4th 747,
Case 3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL Document 7 Filed 11/25/25 PageID.<pageID> Page
1 of 2

2
3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
759 (9th Cir. 2021) (noting the court can invoke Rule 65(a)(2) by giving "clear and
unambiguous notice"). In other words, the Court intends to resolve both the Petition and
the TRO.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 25, 2025
Case 3:25-cv-03253-JES-DDL Document 7 Filed 11/25/25 PageID.<pageID> Page
2 of 2