Netgear, Inc. v. Elitecom Technologies Corporation

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:26-cv-05417-SVK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
NETGEAR, Inc.
Plaintiff,
v.
Elitecom Technologies Corporation,
Defendant.
Civil Action No. 5:26-cv-05417-SVK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
[Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2]
Jason N. Haycock (SBN 278983)
Jason.Haycock@klgates.com
K. Taylor Yamahata (SBN 347192)
Taylor.Yamahata@klgates.com
K&L Gates LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 9411
Telephone: +1 415 882 8200
Facsimile: +1 415.882.8220
Morgan T. Nickerson (pro hac vice forthcoming)
Morgan.Nickerson@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
One Congress Street, 29th Floor
Boston, MA 02114
Telephone: +1 617 261 3134
Facsimile: +1 617 261 3175
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NETGEAR, Inc.
Case 5:26-cv-05417-SVK Document 13 Filed 10/08/26 Page 1 of 3

1615058362.1
- 1 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:26-cv-05417-SVK
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: October 7, 2026
By: /s/ Jason N. Haycock
Jason N. Haycock
K. Taylor Yamahata
Morgan T. Nickerson (pro hac
forthcoming)
Attorneys for Plaintiff NETGEAR, Inc.
By: /s/ Alin Lin
Alin Lin
Chief Executive Officer
Elitecom Technologies Corporation
WHEREAS, Plaintiff NETGEAR, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) filed its Complaint in this
action;
WHEREAS, Defendant Elitecom Technologies Corporation (“Defendant”)
was served with the Summons and Complaint on September 17, 2026;
WHEREAS, Defendant is currently in the process of identifying and retaining
California litigation counsel to represent it in this action;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have met and conferred and agreed to a
21-day extension of time for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the
Complaint, up to and including October 29, 2026;
WHEREAS, this extension will not alter the schedule for any event or any
deadline already fixed by Court order;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by
and between Plaintiff and Defendant, that Defendant Elitecom Technologies
Corporation’s deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s
Complaint is extended up to and including October 29, 2026.
Case 5:26-cv-05417-SVK Document 13 Filed 10/08/26 Page 2 of 3

- 2 -
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. 5:26-cv-05417-SVK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Defendant Elitecom Technologies Corporation shall answer, move, or
otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before October 29, 2026.
Dated: __________________
____________________________________
Hon. Susan van Keulen
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
October 8, 2026
Case 5:26-cv-05417-SVK Document 13 Filed 10/08/26 Page 3 of 3