5:23-cv-01311•Trevino v. Dotson et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT TREVINO, Plaintiff, v. E. DOTSON, et al., Defendants. Case No. 23-cv-01311-NW ORDER SETTING ASIDE OCTOBER 9, 2025 DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS Re: ECF No. 35 On August 20, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff Robert Trevino’s Amended Complaint and dismissed certain claims that did not state cognizable § 1983 claims. The Court granted Trevino leave to file an amended complaint within 28 days. See ECF No. 34. Trevino did not file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the Court for several months, and the Court subsequently dismissed the non-cognizable claims and ordered service of the Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 35. Trevino has now provided the Court with evidence that he never received the Court’s August 20, 2025 Order, and he therefore did not have an opportunity to review it and attempt to address the deficiencies identified during screening. See ECF No. 56. Accordingly, the Court SETS ASIDE its October 9, 2025 dismissal of certain claims in the Amended Complaint. See ECF No. 35. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 23, 2026 Noël Wise United States District Judge Case 5:23-cv-01311-NW Document 58 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.