Brosnan v. United States of America

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOHN BROSNAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
Case No. 25-cv-10678-KAW
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 9
On February 5, 2026, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Pursuant
to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff’s opposition was due 14 days after the motion was filed,
which was February 19, 2026.
To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. Pursuant to
the undersigned’s standing order, “[t]he failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of
points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the
motion.” (Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 23.)
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered, on or before March 2, 2026, 1) to file an opposition or
statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, and 2) to file a response to this order to show
cause explaining why the opposition was not timely filed. Should an opposition be filed,
Defendant may file a reply on or before March 9, 2026.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 23, 2026
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 4:25-cv-10678-KAW Document 14 Filed 02/23/26 Page 1 of 1