Kaiser et al v. The Progressive Corporation et al

4:25-cv-09900CandDec 15, 2025

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANIEL KAISER AND LOGAN KERWIN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
The Progressive Corporation, Blue Hill
Specialty Insurance Company Inc., and DOES
1-100,
Defendants,
CASE NO. 4:25-cv-09900-HSG
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
[Filed concurrently with Stipulation
Extending Time for Defendants’ Response to
Complaint; and Declaration of Kymberly
Kochis]
Case 4:25-cv-09900-HSG Document 15 Filed 12/15/25 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
ORDER
NOW, THEREFORE, having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time for
Defendants’ Response to Complaint, the Court ORDERS that:
1. 	Defendants shall have until February 10, 2026, to file their responsive pleading;
2. 	Plaintiffs shall have until March 10, 2026, to file an opposition;
3. 	Defendants shall have until March 27, 2026, to file a reply.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 12/15/2025
_________________________________
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-09900-HSG Document 15 Filed 12/15/25 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.