Rodriguez v. Jane & John Doe

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District
 Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NOE RODRIGUEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
JANE DOE, et al.,
Respondents.
Case No. 25-cv-09467-JST
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On November 3, 2025, the Court docketed pleadings received from Mr. Rodriguez,
wherein he alleged that his custody is improper and constituted kidnapping. ECF Nos. 1, 2.
Because Mr. Rodriguez sought relief from this Court, the Court opened an action pursuant to this
filing. That same day, the Court sent Mr. Rodriguez deficiency notices, informing him that he had
not submitted his action on the proper case-initiating form and that he neither paid the filing fee,
nor filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 3, 4. The Court
instructed Mr. Rodriguez that he should cure these deficiencies by December 1, 2025 by filing his
complaint on the proper form, and either paying the filing fee or filing an in forma pauperis
application. Id. The Court sent Plaintiff a blank habeas petition form and a blank in forma
pauperis application form. Id. The deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed the required
documents. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to meet these
filing requirements. Judgment is entered against Plaintiff. The Clerk shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 19, 2026
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Case 4:25-cv-09467-JST Document 8 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 1