4:25-cv-08462•Singh et al v. Bondi et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA H ARPREET S INGH, ET AL ., Plaintiffs, vs. PAM B ONDI , ET AL ., Defendants. Case No. 4:25-cv-08462-YGR O RDER DISMISSING CASE On December 17, 2025, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause as to why the petition should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiffs were ordered to respond by no later than December 22, 2025, and were warned that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff did not file a response. Pursuant to the Court’s December 17, 2025 order, this case is DISMISSED. The clerk shall close the action. I T I S S O O RDERED. Dated: February 20, 2026 YVONNE G ONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-08462-YGR Document 12 Filed 02/20/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.