Singh et al v. Bondi et al

4:25-cv-08462CandDec 1, 2025

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
H ARPREET S INGH, ET AL .,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PAM B ONDI , ET AL .,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:25-cv-08462-YGR
O RDER T O S HOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt Nos. 1, 7
The Court has received the petition for the writ of habeas corpus from Harpreet Singh,
Gurpatap Bhatti, Arman Singh Dhillon, Rohit Rohit, Princepal Singh, and Jaskanpreet Singh. Dkt.
Nos. 1, 7. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243, respondents are ordered to show cause why the writ
should not be granted. Respondents must return the order to show cause within three days of the
filing of this order. In order to protect this Court’s jurisdiction, and pending further order of the
Court, defendants are barred from removing petitioners from the United States.
The Court further S ETS a status conference for Wednesday December 3, 2025 at 11:00
a.m. via Zoom.
The Clerk of Court shall serve this Order to Show Cause by email to the Civil Division of
the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California.
I T I S S O O RDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2025
YVONNE G ONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED S TATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-08462-YGR Document 8 Filed 12/01/25 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.