4:24-cv-08793•Glover et al v. County of San Mateo et al
Full text
Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice [24-cv-08793-HSG] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORBACH HUFF & HENDERSON LLP Kevin E. Gilbert, Esq. (SBN: 209236) kgilbert@ohhlegal.com Carolyn M. Aguilar, Esq. (SBN: 289550) caguilar@ohhlegal.com ORBACH HUFF & HENDERSON LLP 6200 Stoneridge Mall Road, Suite 225 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Telephone: (510) 999-7908 Facsimile: (510) 999-7918 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF REDWOOD CITY and OFFICER ERICK CHAVEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RITA GLOVER, an individual; ERNESTO VARGAS, an individual; and J.V., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, DANISHA BANKS, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, a municipal corporation; CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, a municipal corporation; ERICK CHAVEZ, in his official capacity for the Redwood City Police Department; ALEJANDRO AVENDANO, in his official capacity for the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 24-cv-08793-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Case 4:24-cv-08793-HSG Document 95 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 3
- 1 - Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice [24-cv-08793-HSG] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORBACH HUFF & HENDERSON LLP STIPULATION Plaintiffs RITA GLOVER, ERNESTO VARGAS, and J.V., a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, DANISHA BANKS (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants CITY OF REDWOOD CITY and OFFICER ERICK CHAVEZ (“City Defendants”), and Defendant COUNTY OF SAN MATEO (“County Defendant”), and ALEJANDRO AVENDANO (“Avendano”) (collectively, “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel in the above-captioned matter, hereby stipulate, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that all claims and causes of action in this matter be dismissed with prejudice, with Plaintiffs, City Defendants, County Defendant, and Avendano to each bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. Dated: February 18, 2026 POINTER & BUELNA, LLP By: Adanté D. Pointer Patrick M. Buelna Ty L. Clarke Attorneys for Plaintiffs Dated: February 18, 2026 ORBACH HUFF & HENDERSON LLP By: /s/ Kevin E. Gilbert Kevin E. Gilbert Attorney for Defendants CITY OF REDWOOD CITY and OFFICER ERICK CHAVEZ Dated: February 18, 2026 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO By: JOHN D. NIBBELIN, COUNTY COUNSEL By: Paul S. Sheng, Deputy By: Candice Costa, Deputy Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Dated: February 18, 2026 MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP By: Eugene P. Ramirez Andrea Kornblau Khouloud Pearson Attorneys for Defendant ALEJANDRO AVENDANO /s/ Andrea Kornblau /s/ Ty L. Clarke Case 4:24-cv-08793-HSG Document 95 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 3
- 2 - Stipulation and Order to Dismiss Entire Action With Prejudice [24-cv-08793-HSG] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORBACH HUFF & HENDERSON LLP ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims and causes of action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with Plaintiffs, City Defendants, County Defendant, and Avendano to each bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/19/2026 Case 4:24-cv-08793-HSG Document 95 Filed 02/19/26 Page 3 of 3
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.