4:23-cv-00187•Arrellano et al v. Sonoma County et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRANCISCO ARRELLANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DEENA MISTRY, Defendant. Case No. 23-cv-00187-ASK JUDGMENT Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116 On May 12, 2026, the Court granted Defendant Mistry’s unopposed motion for summary judgment of Plaintiff Arrellano’s claims. Dkt. 115. On May 2 , 2026, the Court granted Defendant Mistry’s unopposed motion for summary judgment of minor Plaintiff S.A.’s claims. Dkt. 116. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 28, 2026 AJAY KRISHNAN United States Magistrate Judge 8 Case 4:23-cv-00187-ASK Document 117 Filed 05/28/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.