3:26-cv-03136•Ng v. United Financial Casualty Company
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAK LUN NG, Plaintiff, v. UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 26-cv-03136-LJC ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 43 The Court issued an order of dismissal (ECF No. 41) and the Clerk entered judgment for Defendant (ECF No. 42) on September 28, 2026. Plaintiff has filed a “Reply” arguing that the Court’s Order was erroneous, which might also be intended as a motion for leave to amend, for reconsideration, or to alter or amend judgment. To the extent Plaintiff seeks such relief, it is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court’s previous Order. To the extent Plaintiff’s filing purports to notice a hearing for October 15, 2026, that hearing is VACATED. The Court will not respond to any further motions challenging matters previously decided or seeking to reopen this closed case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 9, 2026 LISA J. CISNEROS United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:26-cv-03136-LJC Document 44 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.