3:26-cv-02232•McPhee v. Big Brand Tire & Service
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHRIS MCPHEE, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. BIG BRAND TIRE & SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Case No. 26-cv-02232-RS ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING The hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss, presently set for October 15, 2026, is vacated. Within 10 days of the date of this order, plaintiffs shall submit a supplemental brief, not to exceed 12 pages, addressing Fons v. Grocery Outlet, Inc., 2026 WL 2876369 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 24, 2026). Plaintiffs shall also address the impact of the enactment of Senate Bill 690 on the claim under CIPA § 638.51. Within 7 days thereafter, defendants may submit a response, also not to exceed 12 pages. The motion will then be submitted for decision without argument, or reset for hearing, in the court’s discretion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2026 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge Case 3:26-cv-02232-RS Document 36 Filed 10/13/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.