Doe v. GoodRx Holdings, Inc. et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JANE DOE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GOODRX HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 23-cv-00501-AMO
ORDER
Re: Dkt. Nos. 292, 293, 294
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ administrative motion seeking leave to file supplemental
briefing on a motion for preliminary approval of class settlement. Dkt. No. 294. Plaintiffs’
proposed supplemental briefing relates to a motion upon which the Court already ruled – the Court
denied Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval on January 16, 2026. Dkt. No. 267. The time
to seek reconsideration of that denial has long since passed, and the Court declines to revisit the
earlier motion. Therefore, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ administrative motion to file
supplemental briefing. To the extent the parties have modified their proposed settlement and have
prepared additional factual support for preliminary approval, Plaintiffs may submit a new motion
for preliminary approval that stands on its own.
Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ administrative motions to file under
seal. Dkt. Nos. 292, 293.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2026
ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN
United States District Judge
Case 3:23-cv-00501-AMO Document 295 Filed 03/26/26 Page 1 of 1