3:23-cv-00201•Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Master Case No. 23-CV-00201-WHO (LJC) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SARAH ANDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. STABILITY AI LTD., et al., Defendants. Case No. 23-CV-00201-WHO (LJC) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED REGARDING DISPUTES OVER RUNWAY’S 30(B)(1) WITNESSES Judge: Hon. Lisa J. Cisneros Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 637 Filed 07/08/26 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Master Case No. 23-CV-00201-WHO (LJC) Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Material Should Be Sealed regarding Plaintiffs’ Joint Letter Brief regarding disputes over Runway’s 30(b)(1) witnesses. Having considered the parties’ arguments, all papers filed herein, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS the following: Document Portions Sought to be Sealed Evidence Offered in support of Sealing Order Plaintiffs’ Joint Letter Brief regarding disputes over Runway’s 30(b)(1) witnesses Highlighted portions on page 2 Defendant to provide evidence, per Local Rule 79- 5(f)(3) IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: Honorable Lisa. L. Cisneros United States Magistrate Judge July 8, 2026 GRANTED Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 637 Filed 07/08/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.