3:23-cr-00473•USA v. Arteaga et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SIERRA PROMISE DUGAN Sierra Dugan Law 420 3rd Street, Suite 250 Oakland, California 94607 Tel. 510.214.2194 sierra@sierraduganlaw.com Counsel for Defendant JOSE MEDINA MURILLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MEDINA MURILLO, Defendant. No. 3:23-CR-00473 CRB STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT FROM JANUARY 6, 2025 THROUGH APRIL 1, 2026; [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties were scheduled to appear for status on March 25, 2026 that has been continued to April 1, 2026 at the defense’s request for effective preparation of counsel after having the defendant assessed for competency by a doctor. The parties stipulate and respectfully request that the time from March 25, 2026 through April 1, 2026 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time to necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: March 26, 2026 s/ Sierra Dugan SIERRA DUGAN Counsel for Defendant JOSE MEDINA MURILLO Dated: March 26, 2026 s/ SD per email authorization KEVIN YEH Assistant U.S. Attorney Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 98 Filed 03/31/26 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 USA v. Medina Murillo, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, Case No. 3:23-cr-00473-CRB 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER For the reasons stated in the parties’ stipulations, the Court finds that the exclusion of time for effective preparation from March 25, 2026 through April 1, 2026, is warranted and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A). The failure to grant the requested continuance by the defense would deny the defendant the time necessary for effective preparation of counsel taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: HON. CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE March 31, 2026 Case 3:23-cr-00473-CRB Document 98 Filed 03/31/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.