3:22-cv-07668•Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAUREN HUGHES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. Case No. 22-cv-07668-VC (TSH) ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 187 The motion to seal at ECF No. 187 is denied because the proposed redactions are overbroad. This order is without prejudice to Plaintiffs proposing narrowly tailored redactions within five days. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 3, 2025 THOMAS S. HIXSON United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:22-cv-07668-VC Document 199 Filed 11/03/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.