Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.

3:22-cv-07668CandOct 21, 2025

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of
 California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAUREN HUGHES, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-07668-VC (TSH)
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 180
The parties have a discovery dispute about redactions Plaintiffs have made to their medical
records. It’s difficult to evaluate Apple’s arguments, as they are presented in the abstract.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and to jointly submit 10
examples of redacted medical records (each side gets to pick five) and provide them and the
related redaction logs to the Court for in camera review within five days. The parties shall lodge
these documents with the Court in hard copy in one or more binders. The binder(s) shall clearly
indicate which side picked which documents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 21, 2025
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:22-cv-07668-VC Document 185 Filed 10/21/25 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.