A.H. v. West Contra Costa Unified School District et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
A. H.,
Plaintiff,
v.
WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 22-cv-03233-AMO
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING ON SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
Re: Dkt. No. 104
Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment from Defendants Summer Sigler and
West Contra Costa Unified School District. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of Plaintiff
A.H.’s remaining causes of action. Only one of the remaining causes of action arises under
federal law: discrimination in violation of Title IX against the District.
The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the following
question:
In light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Royal Canin
U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. 22 (2025), may the Court
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s remaining state
law claims if it determines that the Title IX cause of action fails on
the merits?
The parties’ supplemental briefs shall not exceed three (3) pages in length and must be filed by no
later than 10:00 a.m. on Friday, December 12, 2025.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 8, 2025
ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN
United States District Judge
Case 3:22-cv-03233-AMO Document 108 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 1