Netskope, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc.

3:22-cv-01852CandJan 6, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NETSKOPE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
FORTINET, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-01852-TLT (AGT)
ORDER RE: ELECTRONIC
CHAMBERS COPIES OF
DOCUMENTS FILED UNDER SEAL
The parties have filed many exhibits to their discovery motions and letter briefs pro-
visionally under seal. To aid the Court’s review of the sealing motions, the Court requests
that the parties use a secure file transfer platform to share with the Court copies of all provi-
sionally sealed documents, plus copies of the corresponding sealing motions and all state-
ments and declarations submitted in support of them. All such documents must include a
CM/ECF docket number, and the docket number should be included in the file name.
The parties shall upload these files, and shall email access credentials to ag-
tcrd@cand.uscourts.gov, by January 16, 2026. Going forward, when the parties file docu-
ments provisionally under seal in conjunction with any discovery dispute, they must upload
copies of those documents, plus the corresponding motion to seal, to the file transfer plat-
form. The parties must add to the file transfer platform, on the date of CM/ECF filing, any
Case 3:22-cv-01852-TLT Document 254 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2
2
statements or declarations filed in support of a motion to seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 6, 2026
______________________________
Alex G. Tse
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:22-cv-01852-TLT Document 254 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.