Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC D/B/A Heritage Pac v. Hanson

4:10-ap-04246CanbAug 1, 2011

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
In re 	) 	Case No. 10-45167
)
Centorial D. Hanson, 	)
)
Debtor, 	) 	Chapter 13
)
_____________________________ 	)
)
Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	Adv. Pro. No. 10-4246
)
)
vs. 	)
)
Centorial D. Hanson, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
__________________________________ 	)
MEMORANDUM TO PARTIES RE: HEARING ON PLAINTIFF HERITAGE PACIFIC
FINANCIAL, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“the Motion”) and
the supporting pleadings and declarations. The Court notes that the Motion is based principally
upon matters that are deemed admitted as a result of Defendant’s failure to answer Plaintiff’s
The following constitutes the
Memorandum Decision of the Court.
Signed August 01, 2011
________________________________________
William J. Lafferty, III
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge	________________________________________
Entered on Docket
August 02, 2011
GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK
U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case: 10-04246 Doc# 29 Filed: 08/01/11 Entered: 08/02/11 11:00:57 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Requests for Admission (RFAs). The Court further notes that Plaintiff served 49 separate RFAs,
each of which purported to require Respondent to state in detail the basis for denial, if any.
The Court further notes the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1) and
36 and Northern District of California Local Rules 33-1 and 36-1, incorporated into the
Bankruptcy Local Rules by BLR 1001-2, which are relevant to the total number of written
interrogatories permitted in a disputed matter and, by inference, the total number of RFAs when
the RFAs request particular bases for denial.
The Court directs Counsel for the Moving Party to address the applicability of these rules
at the oral argument for the Motion.
***END OF MEMORANDUM***
Case: 10-04246 Doc# 29 Filed: 08/01/11 Entered: 08/02/11 11:00:57 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Court Service List
Centorial D. Hanson
1726 Benedict Drive
San Leandro, CA 94577
Brad A. Mokri
Law Offices of Mokri and Assoc.
1851 E 1st St. #900
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Case: 10-04246 Doc# 29 Filed: 08/01/11 Entered: 08/02/11 11:00:57 Page 3 of 3

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.