4:10-ap-04114•Malikyar v. Moser
Full text
UNITEDSTATES
BANKRUPTCY
COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1300 Clay Street (2d fl.) Oakland, CA. 94612 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Memorandum UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re No. 07-41274 EDJ Chapter 11 REJ PROPERTIES, INC., Debtor./ ALISE MALIKYAR, Adv. Pro. No. 10-04114 AJ Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER MOSER, Defendant./ MEMORANDUM: MOTION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT The above-captioned adversary proceeding was commenced May 7, 2010 when the defendant herein, Christopher Moser (“Moser”), filed a Notice of Removal of State Court Action. Moser is the trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Robert Jacobson (“Jacobson”), pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Signed: July 08, 2010
EDWARD D. JELLEN U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
Entered on Docket July 09, 2010 GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case: 10-04114 Doc# 16 Filed: 07/08/10 Entered: 07/09/10 13:01:31 Page 1 of 4
UNITEDSTATES
BANKRUPTCY
COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1300 Clay Street (2d fl.) Oakland, CA. 94612 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1Case no. 07-41092. 2 Memorandum Texas. 1 The removed action was filed by Alise Malikyar (“Malikyar”), Jacobson’s spouse, in the Alameda County Superior Court, State of California. Malikyar’s action against Moser alleges that Moser improperly treated her separate property as property of the Jacobsen bankruptcy estate. Her complaint includes causes of action for negligence, intentional tort, and fraud. On May 17, 2010 Malikyar filed a motion to remand this action to the Alameda Superior Court. A hearing was held on Malikyar’s motion on June 21, 2010. William McLaughlin appeared on behalf of Moser. Malikyar did not appear. For the reasons hereinafter discussed, the court will deny Malikyar’s motion, and instead, will transfer venue to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In her motion to remand, Malikyar argues that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear her complaint against Moser because her claims arise under state law. The court agrees that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, but not for the reason urged by Malikyar. This is so because a trustee appointed by a bankruptcy court may not be sued in a foreign jurisdiction without permission of the court that appointed the trustee. See In re Crown Vantage, 421 F.3d 963, 970 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that “a party must first obtain leave of the bankruptcy court before it initiates an action in another forum against a bankruptcy trustee or other officer appointed by the bankruptcy court for acts done in the officer’s Case: 10-04114 Doc# 16 Filed: 07/08/10 Entered: 07/09/10 13:01:31 Page 2 of 4
UNITEDSTATES
BANKRUPTCY
COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1300 Clay Street (2d fl.) Oakland, CA. 94612 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 Memorandum official capacity.”); see also Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126, 136- 37 (1881) (holding that the common law bars suits against receivers in a state court other than the court charged with administration of the estate, absent leave of that court.). Moser was appointed trustee of the Jacobsen bankruptcy estate in the bankruptcy court for the Eastern District of Texas. Moser’s “home court” has not granted Malikyar leave to bring an action against Moser in another forum. Therefore, the court directs Moser to submit an order denying Malikyar’s motion to remand this adversary proceeding to state court, and transferring it to the United State Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas. END OF ORDER Case: 10-04114 Doc# 16 Filed: 07/08/10 Entered: 07/09/10 13:01:31 Page 3 of 4
UNITEDSTATES
BANKRUPTCY
COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1300 Clay Street (2d fl.) Oakland, CA. 94612 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4 Memorandum COURT SERVICE LIST Alise Malikyar P.O. Box 1386 559 Mangels Avenue Lafayette, CA 94549 William F. McLaughlin Law Offices of William F. McLaughlin 1305 Franklin St. #301 Oakland, CA 94612 Case: 10-04114 Doc# 16 Filed: 07/08/10 Entered: 07/09/10 13:01:31 Page 4 of 4
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.