WhiteHarvest, LLC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
WHITEHARVEST, LLC, 	No. 10-11769
Debtor(s).
______________________________________/
Memorandum
_________________
In his reply, the Trustee represents that “Debtor’s counsel proposed that he would prepare and
file the motion to sell in order to expedite the process and to limit the estate’s administrative expense
and that the Trustee could join in the motion later.” The court suggests that it will take more than
“joinder” to make a silk purse out of this sow’s ear. The court intends to deny the motion without
prejudice to the Trustee’s rights, not allow the Trustee to make sense out of nonsense. The court also
reminds the Trustee that when the debtor sought to reopen the case, the debtor asked that no trustee be
appointed! The only reason the court reopened the case is to permit the Trustee to try and recover
something for creditors, not give license to a frivolous motion by the debtor. The Trustee is cautioned
that if he lends any credence to the motion he may share liability for any sanctions the court may
consider.
Dated: April 13, 2011
SAlan Jaroslovsky
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
Entered on Docket
April 13, 2011
GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK
U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case: 10-11769 Doc# 66 Filed: 04/13/11 Entered: 04/13/11 14:52:57 Page 1 of 1