Bulmer v. Heal et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
LARRY and KANDY HEAL, 	No. 09-13026
Debtor(s).
______________________________________/
PATRICK BULMER,
Plaintiff(s),
v. 	A.P. No. 09-1184
KANDY HEAL, et al.,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________________/
Memorandum on Post-Hearing Motion
_________________
On December 19, 2010, after a full hearing and hearing all evidence, the court ruled that
plaintiff Patrick Bulmer was unlawfully practicing law and struck his pleadings. Bulmer had
supposedly purchased two judgments with an agreement that sixty percent of whatever he recovered
would be returned to the assignors. Bulmer has moved the court for a new trial and to amend its
findings.
Since that time, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has ordered published its decision in In re
1
Entered on Docket
February 22, 2011
GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK
U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case: 09-01184 Doc# 49 Filed: 02/21/11 Entered: 02/22/11 08:59:09 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Brooms, – B.R.– , 2010 WL 785930, 63 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1543 (9th Cir. BAP 2010). In Brooms,
the bankruptcy court had dismissed an adversary proceeding brought by an assignee of a judgment
because the assignee was not a lawyer and had refused to prove that the assignor had no residual
interest in the judgment. The Appellate Panel affirmed, holding that where the assignor retained any
sort of interest in the judgment or its proceeds the assignee can pursue the judgment in federal court
only by an attorney. That is the same conclusion the court has reached in this case.
Despite the ruling, Bulmer has moved the court for a new trial, for amended findings, and for
reconsideration of its dismissal of the case. He is therefore attempting, still pro se, to benefit the
assignors by his actions. The court will consider those arguments only if made by a licensed attorney.1
For the foregoing reasons, Bulmer’s motion will be denied without prejudice to reconsideration
if made by a licensed attorney. Counsel for Heal shall submit an appropriate form of order.
Dated: February 21, 2011
SAlan Jaroslovsky
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
1Bulmer alleges that he is now the sole owner of one of the judgments, having paid $500.00 for
the judgment of $134,947.83 held by one of his assignors. The court declines to consider this post-
hearing event because the court is not bound to accept this representation without making inquiry as to
whether it is bona fide, it would not retroactively legitimize Bulmer’s past conduct, and that still leaves
Bulmer attempting to represent the other assignor.
2
Case: 09-01184 Doc# 49 Filed: 02/21/11 Entered: 02/22/11 08:59:09 Page 2 of 2