Montes Zepeda v. County of Stanislaus et al

2:25-cv-03299CaedJan 5, 2026

Full text

-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR ADDITIONAL INDIVIDUAL
DEFENDANTS SOLIS AND VIGIL TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
315 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94111
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, and the Parties having stipulated to the
same, the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants Solis and Vigil to respond to
Plaintiffs’ Complaint is APPROVED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Solis and Vigil’s deadline to file a response
to Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended to and includes Monday, March 2, 2026.
Dated: January 5, 2025
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SONIA MONTES ZEPEDA, et al.,
Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:25-cv-03299
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS SOLIS AND
VIGIL TO FILE THEIR RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.