(PS) Castaneda v. 6939 Fair Oaks Blvd TIC LLC

2:25-cv-02804CaedJan 26, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CHERRISH CASTANEDA,
Plaintiff,
v.
6939 FAIR OAKS BLVD TIC LLC,
Defendant.
No. 2:25-cv-2804-TLN-SCR
ORDER
Plaintiff Cherrish Castaneda (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se in this matter, which was
referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
On October 24, 2025 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings
and recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has not
filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time to do so has elapsed.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
///
///
///
///
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 24, 2025 (ECF No. 8) are ADOPTED
IN FULL; and
2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 4) is DENIED.
Date: January 23, 2026
___________________________________
TROY L. NUNLEY
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.