2:25-cv-02030•(PS) Singleton et al v. Freedom Mortgage Corp., et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANDREW SINGLETON and MYRA F. SINGLETON, Plaintiffs, v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATIONM DHI MORTGAGE COMPANY, LTD., LP., Defendants. No. 25-cv-2030 DJC AC PS ORDER Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 2, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty- one days. ECF No. 26. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: //// Case 2:25-cv-02030-DJC-AC Document 27 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 2, 2025, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiffs’ motion to remand (ECF No.17) is DENIED; and 3. This matters is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 5, 2025 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Sing2030.801 Case 2:25-cv-02030-DJC-AC Document 27 Filed 12/08/25 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.