2:25-cv-01610•(PS)Singh v. Lipworth
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RAJ SINGH, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN LIPWORTH, Defendant. No. 2:25-cv-1610-DJC-SCR ORDER Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 5, 2026, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 6. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Case 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR Document 7 Filed 02/17/26 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2026, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s FAC is dismissed without further leave to amend; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 13, 2026 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR Document 7 Filed 02/17/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.