(HC) Hampton v. Samuel

2:25-cv-01126CaedJan 5, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARY GRANT HAMPTON, JR.,
Petitioner,
v.
DANNY SAMUEL, Warden,
Respondent.
No. 2:25-cv-1126 TKN CKD P
ORDER
Petitioner indicates he did not receive a copy of respondent’s reply brief pertaining to
respondent’s motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, the court will direct the Clerk of the
Court to provide petitioner a copy. Petitioner asks for an extension of time to file a sur-reply.
Since the court does not generally permit sur-replies, see Local Rule 230(l), that request will be
denied.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 	The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the reply brief filed
December 5, 2025.
2. 	Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 38) is
DENIED.
Dated: January 5, 2026
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-01126-TLN-CKD Document 39 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.