2:25-cv-01126•(HC) Hampton v. Samuel
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARY GRANT HAMPTON, JR., Petitioner, v. DANNY SAMUEL, Warden, Respondent. No. 2:25-cv-1126 TKN CKD P ORDER Petitioner indicates he did not receive a copy of respondent’s reply brief pertaining to respondent’s motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, the court will direct the Clerk of the Court to provide petitioner a copy. Petitioner asks for an extension of time to file a sur-reply. Since the court does not generally permit sur-replies, see Local Rule 230(l), that request will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the reply brief filed December 5, 2025. 2. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file a sur-reply (ECF No. 38) is DENIED. Dated: January 5, 2026 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-01126-TLN-CKD Document 39 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.