(PS) Brown v. LucidWorks et al

2:25-cv-00607CaedJan 5, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
TAHTIANA JADE BROWN,
Plaintiff,
v.
LUCIDWORKS, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 2:25-cv-00607-DC-CKD (PS)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. Nos. 78, 80)
This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule
302(c)(21). On November 19, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
herein, and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be
filed within fourteen (14) days. (Doc. No. 80.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings
and recommendations, and the time in which to do so has now passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a review of this case. Having carefully reviewed this matter, the court finds
the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on November 19, 2025 (Doc. No. 80) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Defendants LucidWorks, Kyle Hammett, Natalia Pascuzzi, Julianne Kirby, and
Case 2:25-cv-00607-DC-CKD Document 81 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Michael Sinoway’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 78) is GRANTED;
3. This case is dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2025	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-00607-DC-CKD Document 81 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.