(PC) Coronel v. Fernandez

2:24-cv-02389CaedJan 5, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HANK RICHARD CORONEL,
Plaintiff,
v.
R. FERNANDEZ,
Defendant.
No. 2:24-cv-02389-DC-EFB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. No. 10)
Plaintiff Hank Richard Coronel, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed this civil rights
action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
which were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff has not filed
objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time to do so has passed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
analysis.
/////
Case 2:24-cv-02389-DC-EFB Document 11 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on November 10, 2025 (Doc. No. 10) are
ADOPTED in full;
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing
fee; and
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2025	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:24-cv-02389-DC-EFB Document 11 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.