(PC) Coronel v. Fernandez

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
HANK RICHARD CORONEL,
Plaintiff,
v.
R. FERNANDEZ,
Defendant.
No. 2:24-cv-02389-EFB (PC)
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1).
On May 7, 2025, the court ordered plaintiff to pay the filing fee or file an application to
proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not responded to the order.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district
judge to this action. It is further RECOMMENDED that the case be dismissed without prejudice
for failure to pay the filing fee.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
Case 2:24-cv-02389-DC-EFB Document 10 Filed 11/10/25 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Dated: November 10, 2025
Case 2:24-cv-02389-DC-EFB Document 10 Filed 11/10/25 Page 2 of 2