(SS) Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security

2:24-cv-01790CaedJan 5, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAURIN SHANE DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
No. 2:24-cv-01790-DC-SCR
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
(Doc. Nos. 12, 15, 16)
Plaintiff Laurin Shane Davis, proceeding with counsel, brings this action seeking judicial
review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s application for
benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter was referred to the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 29, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
which were served on all parties and contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (Doc. No. 16.) Neither
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, and the time in which to do so
has now passed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
Case 2:24-cv-01790-DC-SCR Document 17 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on September 29, 2025 (Doc. No. 16) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED;
3. Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED;
4. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings
consistent with the findings and recommendations issued on September 29, 2025
(Doc. No. 16); and
5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 4, 2026	___________________________
Dena Coggins
United States District Judge
Case 2:24-cv-01790-DC-SCR Document 17 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.