(HC) Castle v. Bureau of Prisons

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES CHRISTOPHER CASTLE,
Petitioner,
v.
BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondent.
No. 2:24-cv-1722 CKD P
ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the
postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 183, which requires
that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. 	The Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and
2. 	Respondent is relieved of the requirement that they file a response to petitioner’s
habeas petition.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for petitioner’s failure
to keep the court apprised of his current address.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
Dated: October 20, 2025
1
cast1722.33a
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE