USA v. Lolohea

2:24-cr-00318CaedNov 12, 2025

Full text

-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States v. Lolohea, Et. Al.,
2:24cr318-DJC
Stipulation and Order to Continue/Exclude
Time
HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, SBN 122664
Federal Defender
HOOTAN BAIGMOHAMMADI, SBN 279105
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
801 I Street, Third Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
T: (916) 498-5700
F: (916) 498-5710
Attorneys for Defendant
Taumai Lolohea
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
vs.
TAUMAI LOLOHEA &
EMALATA LOLOHEA,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:24cr318-DJC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE
STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME
Date: November 20, 2025
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between United States Attorney Eric
Grant, through Assistant United States Attorney Robert Abendroth, counsel for Plaintiff, Federal
Defender Heather Williams, through Assistant Federal Defender Hootan Baigmohammadi,
counsel for Defendant TAUMAI LOLOHEA, and William Portonova, attorney for defendant
EMALATA LOLOHEA, that the Status Conference currently set for November 20, 2025 at 9:00
be continued to February 26, 2026 at 9:00 a.m.
The parties specifically stipulate as follows:
1. 	To date, the government has produced over 500 pages, 26 audio/video files,
cellular extractions for five devices, and significant additional native discovery
pertaining to social media in discovery. The case has been declared complex
under local code T2. Dkt. 42.
2. 	The defendants move for the Status Conference to be continued to February 26,
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States v. Lolohea, Et. Al.,
2:24cr318-DJC
Stipulation and Order to Continue/Exclude
Time
2026 at 9:00 a.m. because they need additional time to review discovery and
investigate the case.
3. 	The defendants believe that failure to grant the requested continuance would deny
them the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account
the exercise of due diligence.
4. 	The government does not object to the continuance request.
5. 	For the purpose of computing time under 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. (Speedy Trial
Act), the parties request that the time period between November 20, 2025 and
February 26, 2026, inclusive, be deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) (Local Code T4), because it would result from a continuance
granted by the Court at the defense’s request, based on a finding that the ends of
justice served by granting the continuance outweighs the best interest of the
public and in a speedy trial. The parties also agree that it is appropriate to grant
the request because the case is complex (Local Code T2).
Respectfully submitted,
HEATHER E. WILLIAMS
Federal Defender
Date: November 7, 2025 	/s/ Hootan Baigmohammadi
HOOTAN BAIGMOHAMMADI
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorneys for TAUMAI LOLOHEA
/s/ William Portonova
WILLIAM PORTONOVA
Attorney for EMALATA LOLOHEA
Date: November 7, 2025 	ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
/s/ Robert Abendroth
ROBERT ABENDROTH
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Plaintiff
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States v. Lolohea, Et. Al.,
2:24cr318-DJC
Stipulation and Order to Continue/Exclude
Time
O R D E R
The Court, having received and considered the parties’ stipulation, and good cause
appearing therefrom, adopts the parties’ stipulation in its entirety as its order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 10, 2025 	/s/ Daniel J. Calabretta
THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.