1:25-cv-01908•(HC)Pedrozo Munoz et al v. Chestnut et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHILBER PEDROZO MUNOZ, Petitioner, v. CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., Respondents. No. 1:25-cv-01908-DC-EFB (HC) ORDER Petitioner proceeds with this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent is directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondents’ answer/response to the § 2241 petition is due no later than 20 days from the date of this order. 2. Petitioner’s reply is due 14 days after being served with the answer. 3. Respondent shall request and obtain petitioner’s complete A-file and provide a copy to petitioner’s counsel upon receipt. DATED: December 31, 2025 Case 1:25-cv-01908-DC-EFB Document 10 Filed 12/31/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.