(HC) Uulu v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility et al

1:25-cv-01812CaedFeb 3, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
----oo0oo----
KANATBEK ALMAZBEK UULU,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN, ET AL.,
Respondents.
No. 1:25-cv-01812-WBS-CKD
ORDER
----oo0oo----
Petitioner Kanatbek Almazbek Uulu has filed a motion
for temporary restraining order. (Docket No. 12.) Respondents
SHALL file any opposition to petitioner’s motion on or before
February 5, 2026.
The United States Attorney has acknowledged that the
prolonged detention of a noncitizen without a bond hearing may
violate the Due Process Clause. Petitioner alleges that he has
been detained for over fourteen months without such a hearing,
“violating his Due Process rights.” (Id. at 2.) Accordingly, in
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 2
their response, Respondents shall advise whether the length and
circumstances of Petitioner’s detention indeed violates his
rights under the Due Process Clause.
The court will then take the motion under submission
and inform the parties if oral argument or further proceedings
are necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2026

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.