(PC)Neice v. Rabbi Lerdo PreTrial et al

1:25-cv-01609CaedJan 6, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT DEAN NEICE,
Plaintiff,
v.
RABBI, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 1:25-cv-01609-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
(ECF No. 5)
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On November 26, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found that Plaintiff stated
a cognizable free exercise of religion claim against the Rabbi at Lerdo Pretrial Facility. (ECF No.
5.) The Court granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint or notify the Court of his
intent to proceed on the cognizable claim. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or
notified the Court of his intent to proceed on the free exercise of religion claim and the time to do
so has passed.1 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within
fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed
for failure to comply with a court order. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in
1 The Court notes that on December 19, 2025, Plaintiff filed an unrelated notice regarding submission of the prison
trust account statement. (ECF No. 6.)
Case 1:25-cv-01609-JLT-SAB Document 8 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
a recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to comply with a court order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2026
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:25-cv-01609-JLT-SAB Document 8 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.