1:25-cv-01179•(SS) White v. Commissioner of Social Security
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JENNA KAY WHITE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 1:25-cv-01179-SAB ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE BRIEF (ECF No. 10) Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation for an extension of time in which Defendant may file a responsive brief in support of his position of whether the Court should affirm, reverse, or modify a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for Social Security benefits. 42 U.S.C. 405(g). For good cause shown, the Court approves the stipulation and ORDERS that Defendant shall have through December 17, 2025, to file a responsive brief. The scheduling order (ECF No. 5) otherwise remains controlling. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.