(PC)Hagan v. Recarey et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KEVIN HAGAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
RECAREY, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 1:22-cv-00562-JLT-EPG (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(Doc. 106)
Kevin Hagan is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief and on April
18, 2025, and a supplement to that motion on April 18. 2025. (Docs. 76, 78.) This matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
302.
On October 21, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and
Recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief. (Doc. 106.) The Court served
the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and informed him that objections were due in 30
days. (Id. at 8.) No objections were filed and the time to do so has passed.
According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including the objections, the
Court concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
1. The findings and recommendations issued on October 21, 2025, are ADOPTED
IN FULL. (Doc. 106.)
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Docs. 76, 78.) be DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 31, 2025