Linda Jean Moca

2:98-bk-26952CacbJan 25, 2013

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES DIVISION
In re
LINDA JEAN MOCA,
Debtor.
Case No. 2:98-bk-26952-RK
Chapter 7
STATEMENT OF DECISION RE ORDER
DENYING MOTION AND REQUESTS OF
HRISTOS MOCA TO: (1) REOPEN
CASE; (2) SET ASIDE SETTLEMENT
ORDER; AND (3) REFUND
SETTLEMENT PAYMENT
By separate order, the court denied the renewed motion of creditor Hristos Moca
(“creditor”) to reopen this bankruptcy case, to set aside a settlement order, and to refund
a settlement payment, filed on December 20, 2012 (the “renewed motion”). In this
statement of decision, the court explains its reasons for denying the renewed motion.
Creditor brought a similar motion on January 25, 2012, seeking to bring a
fraudulent transfer action against the debtor based on transfers that occurred in 1995,
about 17 years ago. The court denied the original motion and issued a separate
statement of decision explaining the ruling on March 29, 2012. See Bankruptcy Docket
Nos. 154, 155.
In the renewed motion, creditor raises one additional argument not raised in the
original motion for why grounds exist under 11 U.S.C. § 350(b) to reopen the bankruptcy
FILED & ENTERED
JAN 25 2013
CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
Central District of California
BY DEPUTY CLERK	tatum
Case 2:98-bk-26952-EC Doc 166 Filed 01/25/13 Entered 01/25/13 12:07:20 Desc
Main Document Page 1 of 3
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
case. Creditor argues that the doctrine of equitable tolling applies, and that he should be
allowed to bring an action for fraudulent transfer against the debtor, despite the seven-
year statue of limitations provided in California Civil Code § 3439.09(c). Creditor,
however, cannot prevail on this argument. The statute of limitations provided in
California Civil Code § 3439.09(c) is an absolute bar against fraudulent transfer claims
older than seven years and is thus a “statute of repose;” which may not be extended
further under the doctrine of equitable tolling. In re JMC Telecom LLC, 416 B.R. 738, 744
(C.D. Cal. 2009) (holding that “[a]pplying equitable tolling would be inconsistent with a
statute of repose, like § 3439.09(c), which sets a definitive outside limit on the amount of
time to file a suit”); see also, Munoz v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 950, 957 (9th Cir. 2003)(“A
statute of repose is a fixed, statutory cutoff date, usually independent of any variable,
such as claimant’s awareness of a violation.”)(citation omitted).
The creditor has not otherwise shown that there is any applicable equitable
doctrine to except his claims from the statutory time bar of California Civil Code
§ 3439.09(c). Accordingly, the court concluded that creditor’s motion to reopen debtor’s
bankruptcy case to bring a time-barred fraudulent transfer action against her should be
denied.
###
Date: January 25, 2013
Case 2:98-bk-26952-EC Doc 166 Filed 01/25/13 Entered 01/25/13 12:07:20 Desc
Main Document Page 2 of 3
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF ENTERED ORDER AND SERVICE LIST
Notice is given by the court that a judgment or order entitled (specify) STATEMENT OF DECISION RE
ORDER DENYING MOTION AND REQUESTS OF HRISTOS MOCA TO: (1) REOPEN CASE; (2) SET
ASIDE SETTLEMENT ORDER; AND (3) REFUND SETTLEMENT PAYMENT was entered on the date
indicated as “Entered” on the first page of this judgment or order and will be served in the manner indicated
below:
I. SERVED BY THE COURT VIA NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING (“NEF”) – Pursuant to controlling
General Order(s) and Local Bankruptcy Rule(s), the foregoing document was served on the following
person(s) by the court via NEF and hyperlink to the judgment or order. As of January 25, 2013, the
following person(s) are currently on the Electronic Mail Notice List for this bankruptcy case or adversary
proceeding to receive NEF transmission at the email address(es) indicated below:
Enid M Colson emc@dgdk.com, ecolson@dgdk.com;DanningGill@gmail.com
David A Gill (TR) mlr@dgdk.com, dgill@ecf.epiqsystems.com;DanningGill@Gmail.com
Harriet L Goldfarb hlgoldfarb@yahoo.com
United States Trustee (LA) ustpregion16.la.ecf@usdoj.gov
Service information continued on attached page
II. SERVED BY THE COURT VIA U.S. MAIL: A copy of this notice and a true copy of this judgment or
order was sent by U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid, to the following person(s) and/or entity(ies) at the
address(es) indicated below:
Linda Jean Moca
232 N Mayflower Ave
Monrovia, CA 91016
Hristos Moca
7050 Bertrand Ave
Reseda, CA 91335
Service information continued on attached page
III. TO BE SERVED BY THE LODGING PARTY: Within 72 hours after receipt of a copy of this judgment or
order which bears an “Entered” stamp, the party lodging the judgment or order will serve a complete copy
bearing an “Entered” stamp by U.S. Mail, overnight mail, facsimile transmission or email and file a proof of
service of the entered order on the following person(s) and/or entity(ies) at the address(es), facsimile
transmission number(s) and/or email address(es) indicated below:
Service information continued on attached page
Case 2:98-bk-26952-EC Doc 166 Filed 01/25/13 Entered 01/25/13 12:07:20 Desc
Main Document Page 3 of 3

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.