2:07-ap-01325•ALLEN v. MAYA, LLC
Full text
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35 Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 4
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35 Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33 Desc Main Document Page 2 of 4
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35 Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33 Desc Main Document Page 3 of 4
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35 Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33 Desc Main Document Page 4 of 4
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
AUTHENTICAT
INFORMATIO
Main Document
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35_ Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07.1152:33 De
Page 1 of 4 “pres wg FILED edt Regine
JUL 2 0 2007
) ERE
, ee Depuly Clark
yo ENTERED ~~ |
WE 2 3 20
ae
ERA, U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
coral DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ay Deputy Cesk
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
CYTODYN OF NEW MEXICO, INC.,
Debtor.
MAYA, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability
Company,
Plaintiff,
CYTODYN OR NEW MEXICO, INC., a
corporation; CYTODYN, INC., a
corporation; ALLEN D. ALLEN; CORINNE
E. ALLEN; AMERIMMUNE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.;
AMERIMMUNE, INC.; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
USBC New Mexico
Case No. 07-11008 - s11
Adv. No. 07-01325-TD
Chapter 11
EVIDENTIARY RULINGS
DATE: July, 11, 2007
TIME: 11:00 a.m.
PLACE: Courtroom 1345
190
il
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35 Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33 Desc
Main Document
Page 2 of 4
The following are my evidentiary rulings based on objections to written
declarations filed by Allen D. Allen (Allen) and Maya, LLC (Maya).
1. Objections were filed by Maya to the following declarations, filed on behalf of Allen:
Brubacher declaration in support of motion to transfer, filed May 18, 2007
Maya filed evidentiary objections to the May 18 Brubacher declaration on May
30, 2007. | am ruling on the May 30 objections as follows:
Paragraph and Line Number Ruling
5:27-6 Sustained
6:7-13 Sustained
7(a):18-21 Sustained
7(b):22-23 Sustained
7(d):26-27 Sustained
7(e):28-3 Overruled
7 (f):4-7 Sustained
7(g):8-10 Sustained
9:19-3 Sustained
10:4-41 Sustained
11:12-14 Sustained
Brubacher declaration in opposition to motion for abstention and remand, filed
May 30, 2007
Maya filed evidentiary objections to the May 30 Brubacher declaration on June
6, 2007. | am ruling on the June 6 objections as follows:
Paragraph and Line Number
Ruling
5:27-6 Sustained
6:7-8 Sustained
7(a):13-19 Sustained
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35 Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33 Desc
Main Document Page 3 of 4
7(b):20-21 Sustained
7(d):24-25 Sustained
7(e@):26-28 Overruled
7(f):1-7 Sustained
7(g):8-15 Sustained
11:27-6 Sustained
12:8-14 Overruled
13:15-4 Sustained
14:5-11 Sustained
15:12-15 Sustained
2. Objections were filed by Allen on June 6, 2007 to the following declarations, filed on
behalf of Maya.
Lorman declaration in opposition to motion to transfer, filed May 30, 2007
Sustained as to objections to {3 line 10; {54 lines 13-14; | 57, line 28; and {J
66. Otherwise, the objections are overruled.
The declarant’s testimony and exhibits are offered not to prove the truth of the
matters asserted, but to explain the history of the underlying lawsuit and the basis for
Maya’s opposition to transfer of the lawsuit to the New Mexico bankruptcy court.
Lorman appears to have fairly explained this history from the standpoint of his long-
standing involvement in the dispute as Maya’s (and Lewis’) state court lawyer. The
declaration asserts claims that have not yet been proved in court but require, for
proper determination, a trial and a verdict and decision based on disputed claims
arising during four years of litigation in the Los Angeles Superior Court.
i HONAS ¢ DONOVAN .
United States Bankruptcy Judge
SO ORDERED.
DATED: 7/20/07
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case 2:07-ap-01325-TD Doc 35_ Filed 07/20/07 Entered 07/23/07 11:52:33
Main Document
Page 4 of 4
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OR ORDER
AND CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
TO ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST LISTED BELOW:
1. You are hereby notified that a judgment or order entitled:
EVIDENTIARY RULINGS
was entered on ‘[- 23-07].
Desc
2. | hereby certify that | mailed a true copy of the order or judgment to the persons
and entities listed below on _~1- 23-07.
Debtor/Defendant
Cytodyn of New Mexico, Inc.
227 East Palace Ave.
Suite M
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Attorney for Debtor
William F. Davis, Esq.
William F. Davis & Associates, P.C.
6709 Academy NE, Suite A
P.O. Box 6
Albuquerque, NM 87103
Defendants
Allen D. Allen
4236 Longridge Ave. #302
Studio City, CA 91604
Corinne E. Allen
227 £. Palace Avenue
Suite M
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Amerimmune Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2325-A Renaissance Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Dated: 7- 23-07)
Attorney for Defendants
Gregory M. Salvato
Parker Milliken Clark O’Hara &
Samuelian
555 S. Flower St. 30" Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Plaintiff
Maya, LLC
c/o Bruce Lorman
1416 Sixth Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Attorney for Plaintiff
J. Scott Bovitz, Esq.
Bovitz & Spitzer
880 West First Street
Suite 502
Los Angeles, CA 90012
U.S. Trustee
Office of the U. S. Trustee
Ernst & Young Plaza
725 S. Figueroa St., 26" Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
yA Ah g —
4 ClerkWondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.