Wareka v. Tovar et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Tamara Wareka,
Plaintiff,
v.
Priscilla Tovar LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-25-00323-TUC-AMM (MSA)
ORDER
On April 16, 2026, Magistrate Judge Maria S. Aguilera issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending this Court grant Plaintiff’s Motion for Default
Judgment. (Doc. 29.) Judge Aguilera notified the parties they had fourteen (14) days to
file any written objections to the proposed findings and recommendation. (Id. at 7.)
Neither party filed an objection, and the time to do so has now passed.
A district court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is
not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see also 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those
portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made.”). “[T]he court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on
the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b),
Advisory Committee Notes 1983 Addition. A district judge may “accept, reject, or
modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations” of the magistrate judge. 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Case 4:25-cv-00323-AMM-MSA Document 30 Filed 05/15/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court has reviewed Judge Aguilera’s R&R, the Motion for Default Judgment,
and the record. The Court finds no clear error and agrees with the findings and
recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc.
29.)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment is
GRANTED. (Doc. 26.)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED entering default judgment against Defendants
Priscilla Tovar LLC and Priscilla Tovar jointly and severally in the amount of $25,910.00
(comprised of $21,900.00 in statutory damages, $1,085.00 in costs, and $2,925.00 in
attorney’s fees). Plaintiff is also awarded post-judgment interest at the current rate.
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.
Dated this 14th day of May, 2026.
Case 4:25-cv-00323-AMM-MSA Document 30 Filed 05/15/26 Page 2 of 2