Hodge v. NAPA Genuine Auto Parts

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Najib A Hodge,
Plaintiff,
v.
NAPA Genuine Auto Parts,
Defendant.
No. CV-26-03101-PHX-JAT
ORDER
The Court’s May 18, 2026 Order (Doc. 35) denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Default
Judgment (Doc. 32). On May 21, 2026, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration (Doc.
37). On May 26, 2026, Plaintiff filed a “First Motion for Reconsideration” (Doc. 39). On
May 28, 2026, Plaintiff filed another “First Motion for Reconsideration” (Doc. 40), and on
the same day, Plaintiff also filed a Notice of Errata (Doc. 41) regarding that motion.
Additionally, on May 22, 2026, Plaintiff filed a renewed motion for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis (Doc. 38). The Court’s May 5, 2026 Order severing Plaintiff’s claims
against Defendant NAPA (Doc. 1) ordered that Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status from
the prior case shall continue in the present case. (Doc. 1 at 4). Because the Court has already
granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 9 at 4), Plaintiff’s renewed
motion (Doc. 38) is denied as moot.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motions for reconsideration (Docs. 37, 39, 40) are
denied without prejudice. Plaintiff shall file ONE complete motion for reconsideration,
not to exceed 17 pages (LRCiv 7.2(e)(1)), by Friday, June 5, 2026. Once this motion for
Case 2:26-cv-03101-JAT Document 42 Filed 06/01/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
reconsideration is filed, Plaintiff may not correct, amend, or supplement it.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis (Doc. 38) is denied as moot.
Dated this 1st day of June, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-03101-JAT Document 42 Filed 06/01/26 Page 2 of 2